And ask any criminal (which some actual researchers have done) and they’ll tell you: Knowing a victim might have a gun dissuades them from approaching the victim.
But research on gun control is nowhere near as cool as screaming “guns kill children” and demanding action on Twitter, in between therapy sessions and Pilates.Witness the latest celebrities participating in gun control PSAs.
Most at one point in their career rely on armed security to handle all their safety needs.
If only we were all like Beyoncé, then we could marry a very rich man (and ex-criminal) who has an arsenal.
Jay-Z has ninety-nine problems, but not owning a gun isn’t one.
Bottom line:
The argument ends with “Guns are bad. Guns kill people.
End of story.”
But we know that these asshats are living a lie.
I can’t think of a single television network that is housed in a building that’s considered a “gun-free zone.”
This is where the cool are really dangerous:
They embrace symbolic, worthless goals like gun-free zones and banning ornamental rifle add-ons as a measure of achievement, unaware that their fact-free opinions may in fact be part of our safety problem.
Those opinions are making everyone less safe.
A “gun-free zone” is the safest place for a maniac to kill people.
No comments:
Post a Comment