But its utility is not limited to the courtroom.
- Cross-examination should be part of all our debates, but it’s not, and that is no accident.
- Cross-examination makes it that much harder to lie, and when the only way you can win is through lies, you know what you have to do.
- Look around at our "debates" today. They aren’t debates.
- They are a series of monologues where the speaker never has to defend what he is saying...
And there are a lot of lies...
And when everyone lies, it makes it that much more important to get to the truth.
And when everyone lies, it makes it that much more important to get to the truth.
But you can’t get to the truth unless you can confront people with the holes in their argument...
Look at the Epstein thing...
Many of the alleged victims are just begging to be asked the question, “How old were you anyway when you first got with Epstein, and did he give you money?” And in many cases, an honest answer would be “18 or over” and “yes.”
Well, there’s another word for someone like that, and it’s not “victim.”...