Sunday, December 02, 2018

Enviro-lies!-----Scientists Skeptical of Anthropogenic Global Warming

Scientists Skeptical of Anthropogenic Global Warming
Pablo Sepulveda shared a link.
"Read the rules changed and I have to add comments.
My comment is, The UK is now at over 50% renewable which I would assume mean they reduced 50% of the carbon emissions. 
Does the localized reduced carbon emissions translate into reduce CO2 for that area? 
I understand it wouldn't be a 50% or even 25% reduction of CO2 for there area, but I'd would guess it could be measured and compared. 
Assuming there is a reduced CO2 for their area, is there going to be less growth in their vegetation and how would you measure this? 
Also I'd imagine their air should be cleaner, which should also be measurable."
CLEANTECHNICA.COM
Pushed over the line by two coal-to-biomass conversions and continuing growth in offshore wind, the British renewable energy industry finally surpassed the capacity levels of its fossil fuel predecessors, with total capacity reaching 42 gigawatts (GW) in the third quarter, beating out the fossil fue...
Mark Breckenridge Capacity... What about the production? They're trading coal for burning trees.
Manage
Reply19hEdited
Adam E. Wirth It only takes a few minutes to verify things...
...Great Britain's energy comes from Norwegian oil and Russian coal and gas. 
Wind and solar provide barely anything there. What they also call renewable energies are biomass plants. They actually buy wood scraps from the United States of America and have it shipped over on giant Freighters to burn in their plants. I'm serious look it up. If you think that that is sustainable and renewable you clearly are lacking in your cognitive abilities.

No comments: