Self-censorship on Campus Is Bad for Science - The Atlantic

Self-censorship on Campus Is Bad for Science - The Atlantic:

• Amid heightened tensions on college campuses, well-established scientific ideas are suddenly meeting with stiff political resistance.

"I have taught evolution and genetics at Williams College for about a decade.
 For most of that time, the only complaints I got from students were about grades. 
...The trouble began when we discussed the notion of heritability as it applies to human intelligence. 
(Heritability is the degree to which offspring genetically resemble their parents; the concept can apply not only to physical traits, but also to behavioral ones.) 

In a classroom discussion, I noted that researchers have measured a large average difference in IQ between the inhabitants of the United States and those of my home country, Brazil. 
...My approach has been to teach students...by explaining how scientists understand heritability today, and by discussing how to interpret intelligence data—and how not to.

In class, though, some students argued instead that it is impossible to measure IQ in the first place, that IQ tests were invented to ostracize minority groups, or that IQ is not heritable at all. 
None of these arguments is true. 
In fact, IQ can certainly be measured, and it has some predictive value. 
While the score may not reflect satisfaction in life, it does correlate with academic success. 
And while IQ is very highly influenced by environmental differences, it also has a substantial heritable component; about 50 percent of the variation in measured intelligence among individuals in a population is based on variation in their genes. 
Even so, some students, without any evidence, started to deny the existence of heritability as a biological phenomenon..."
Read all.