The first Republican Presidential debate offered a chance to think about the relationship between misogyny and certain types of opposition to abortion.
Charles Coughlin, the Catholic priest who railed against Jews and capitalism in the nineteen-thirties, did most of his railing via the radios that the American masses had just recently acquired.
In the early fifties, Joseph McCarthy took advantage of television’s advent to attract gavel-to-gavel attention for his congressional hearings.
Donald Trump is a celebrity demagogue, and, for the moment, anyway, the leading Republican Presidential candidate, because of reality television and Twitter.
Both forms shaped Trump’s persona: he’s their creature.
On his own reality-TV show, “The Apprentice,” and now on the campaign trail, Trump displays the particular personality traits that get amped up, hyped, and rewarded on the crassest of these series: he’s as thin-skinned, tantrum-prone, “outrageous,” and narcissistic as a “Real Housewives” villain.
Trump also does a lot of his posturing on the Internet, where trollish taunts can win you a following, and where women sometimes come in for particular contempt.
He has a taste for that, too, as we all know now, if we didn’t before the debate last Thursday.
Here in America, at the beginning of the twenty-first century, sexism is very much on the wane, but misogyny is not.
Misogyny is not amenable to such advances; they can in some circumstances exacerbate it, though they may drive it underground.
An example of misogyny is when someone online threatens to rape and mutilate a woman whose opinions that person does not like.
Another is when a Presidential candidate says of a female journalist whose questions he finds impertinent, “There was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her—wherever.”
No comments:
Post a Comment