Research challenging the safety of Covid-19 vaccines is being silenced by medical journals, stifling critical debate. -
Maryanne Demasi, PhD Medical journals are increasingly acting as gatekeepers, promoting established narratives while sidelining research that challenges the status quo.
- Studies questioning the safety of Covid-19 vaccines, for example, are often dismissed outright, denied the opportunity to undergo peer review.
In some instances, even studies that pass rigorous peer review are later retracted due to external pressures.
- One such example involves a study on adverse events following the Covaxin vaccine, which was retracted after the journal faced pressure from the vaccine manufacturer. The authors were subsequently sued for defamation.
- Similarly, a narrative review examining lessons learned from the global roll-out of the Covid-19 vaccine campaign was retracted post-peer review, with no clear explanation provided...
No comments:
Post a Comment