Michigan Reps. Collene Lamonte, Brandon Dillon pitch House Democrats' Middle Class Plan | MLive.com:
"At a press conference April 2, state Reps. Collene Lamonte, D-Montague, and Brandon Dillon, D-Grand Rapids, promoted the plan, which includes repealing a tax on seniors’ retirement income, and an increase of $320 per student in the state’s dollars-per-student funding.
“We heard these deep concerns over and over again at all of our stops,” Lamonte said.
Lamonte and Dillon declined to talk about how the changes would be paid for, saying that the information would be made public when House Democrats release their budget priorities next week.
But Dillion said the reforms could be accomplished “without raising taxes one penny.”
Wednesday, April 03, 2013
Tuesday, April 02, 2013
Muskegon man, 25, faces trial for allegedly shooting man's abdomen
Muskegon man, 25, faces trial for allegedly shooting man's abdomen | MLive.com:
"The Muskegon County Prosecutor’s Office also added two new counts Tuesday: being a felon in possession of a firearm and possessing a firearm while committing a felony."
"The Muskegon County Prosecutor’s Office also added two new counts Tuesday: being a felon in possession of a firearm and possessing a firearm while committing a felony."
Those Courageous Racists
Best of the Web Today: Those Courageous Racists - WSJ.com:
Their website informs visitors that the twins "received close to a million dollars in grants from the National Science Foundation."
"The NSF is a federal agency, so your tax dollars have subsidized the authors of what can only be described as a racist rant. Here's the opening:
Imagine if African American men and boys were committing mass shootings month after month, year after year. Articles and interviews would flood the media, and we'd have political debates demanding that African Americans be "held accountable."
Then, if an atrocity such as the Newtown, Conn., shootings took place and African American male leaders held a news conference to offer solutions, their credibility would be questionable.
The public would tell these leaders that they need to focus on problems in their own culture and communities.
But when the criminals and leaders are white men, race and gender become the elephant in the room.
Nearly all of the mass shootings in this country in recent years--not just Newtown, Aurora, Fort Hood, Tucson and Columbine--have been committed by white men and boys.
Yet when the National Rifle Association (NRA), led by white men, held a news conference after the Newtown massacre to advise Americans on how to reduce gun violence, its leaders' opinions were widely discussed."
There is so much wrong with this, we could write a column about it.
Which, come to think of it, is exactly what we are doing even as we type.
Their website informs visitors that the twins "received close to a million dollars in grants from the National Science Foundation."
"The NSF is a federal agency, so your tax dollars have subsidized the authors of what can only be described as a racist rant. Here's the opening:
Imagine if African American men and boys were committing mass shootings month after month, year after year. Articles and interviews would flood the media, and we'd have political debates demanding that African Americans be "held accountable."
Then, if an atrocity such as the Newtown, Conn., shootings took place and African American male leaders held a news conference to offer solutions, their credibility would be questionable.
The public would tell these leaders that they need to focus on problems in their own culture and communities.
But when the criminals and leaders are white men, race and gender become the elephant in the room.
Nearly all of the mass shootings in this country in recent years--not just Newtown, Aurora, Fort Hood, Tucson and Columbine--have been committed by white men and boys.
Yet when the National Rifle Association (NRA), led by white men, held a news conference after the Newtown massacre to advise Americans on how to reduce gun violence, its leaders' opinions were widely discussed."
There is so much wrong with this, we could write a column about it.
Which, come to think of it, is exactly what we are doing even as we type.
Sen. Malcolm Smith Arrested In Alleged Plot To Rig NYC Mayor’s Race
Sen. Malcolm Smith Arrested In Alleged Plot To Rig NYC Mayor’s Race « CBS New York:
“The charges we unsealed today demonstrate once again that a ‘show me the money’ culture seems to pervade every level of New York government,” U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said."
“The charges we unsealed today demonstrate once again that a ‘show me the money’ culture seems to pervade every level of New York government,” U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said."
Is Disability the New Welfare?
Is Disability the New Welfare? | RealClearPolitics:
"The government in Britain recently did something interesting.
It asked everyone receiving an "incapacity benefit" — a disability program slowly being phased out under new reforms — to submit to a medical test to confirm they were too disabled to work.
A third of recipients (878,000 people) didn't even bother and dropped out of the program rather than be examined.
Of those tested, more than half (55%) were found fit for work and a quarter were found fit for some work."
"The government in Britain recently did something interesting.
It asked everyone receiving an "incapacity benefit" — a disability program slowly being phased out under new reforms — to submit to a medical test to confirm they were too disabled to work.
A third of recipients (878,000 people) didn't even bother and dropped out of the program rather than be examined.
Of those tested, more than half (55%) were found fit for work and a quarter were found fit for some work."
Associated Press bans the phrase 'illegal immigrant' -
Associated Press bans the phrase 'illegal immigrant' - Washington Times:
“It’s ‘illegal immigrant’ no more” says the Associated Press, which banished the phrase from its usage guide on Tuesday - the latest stylistic edict for journalists who have for years juggled such terms as “undocumented worker” or “illegal alien,” its politically incorrect variant.
“The Stylebook no longer sanctions the term ‘illegal immigrant’ or the use of ‘illegal’ to describe a person. Instead, it tells users that ‘illegal’ should describe only an action, such as living in or immigrating to a country illegally,” said the senior vice president and executive editor Kathleen Carroll.
The wire service’s rationale goes on for many paragraphs before offering the actual Stylebook entry for earnest journalists to consider.
“It’s ‘illegal immigrant’ no more” says the Associated Press, which banished the phrase from its usage guide on Tuesday - the latest stylistic edict for journalists who have for years juggled such terms as “undocumented worker” or “illegal alien,” its politically incorrect variant.
“The Stylebook no longer sanctions the term ‘illegal immigrant’ or the use of ‘illegal’ to describe a person. Instead, it tells users that ‘illegal’ should describe only an action, such as living in or immigrating to a country illegally,” said the senior vice president and executive editor Kathleen Carroll.
The wire service’s rationale goes on for many paragraphs before offering the actual Stylebook entry for earnest journalists to consider.
It reads:
“Illegal immigration
: Entering or residing in a country in violation of civil or criminal law.
“Illegal immigration
: Entering or residing in a country in violation of civil or criminal law. Except in direct quotes essential to the story, use illegal only to refer to an action, not a person: illegal immigration, but not illegal immigrant.
Acceptable variations include living in or entering a country illegally or without legal permission.’
“Except in direct quotations, do not use the terms illegal alien, an illegal, illegals or undocumented.”
“Except in direct quotations, do not use the terms illegal alien, an illegal, illegals or undocumented.”
How Liberal Art Majors Destroyed Stockton
Captain Capitalism: How Liberal Art Majors Destroyed Stockton:
"I pointed this out a while ago, but it needs repeating.
You cannot expect a group of adults whose only experiences are in the non-profit/government/education industries to lead with any measure of competence in that they are politicians first and foremost and have not the ability nor care to adhere to mathematical and financial reality.
They are mentally spoiled little children who just happened to be in adult bodies that purposely and consciously chose weak degrees requiring no rigor, effort or thought, and consequently chose easy "careers."
It should be no shock that Stockton, or any city or organization, led by such weak and talentless people went bankrupt."
"I pointed this out a while ago, but it needs repeating.
You cannot expect a group of adults whose only experiences are in the non-profit/government/education industries to lead with any measure of competence in that they are politicians first and foremost and have not the ability nor care to adhere to mathematical and financial reality.
They are mentally spoiled little children who just happened to be in adult bodies that purposely and consciously chose weak degrees requiring no rigor, effort or thought, and consequently chose easy "careers."
It should be no shock that Stockton, or any city or organization, led by such weak and talentless people went bankrupt."
U.N. passes sweeping international arms regulation viewed by some as Second Amendment overrid
U.N. passes sweeping international arms regulation viewed by some as Second Amendment override - Washington Times:
"American gun rights activists, though, insist the treaty is riddled with loopholes and is unworkable in part because it includes “small arms and light weapons” in its list of weaponry subject to international regulations. They do not trust U.N. assertions that the pact is meant to regulate only cross-border trade and would have no impact on domestic U.S. laws and markets."
"American gun rights activists, though, insist the treaty is riddled with loopholes and is unworkable in part because it includes “small arms and light weapons” in its list of weaponry subject to international regulations. They do not trust U.N. assertions that the pact is meant to regulate only cross-border trade and would have no impact on domestic U.S. laws and markets."
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)