Nugent, who hosts “Spirit of the Wild” on the Outdoors Channel, made the comments during an appearance on TheBlaze TV’s “Dana.”
Important stuff you won't get from the liberal media! We do the surfing so you can be informed AND have a life!
Saturday, September 12, 2015
Ted Nugent Goes on Tirade Against Political Correctness After Verizon Drops Sportsman Channel | TheBlaze.com
Ted Nugent Goes on Tirade Against Political Correctness After Verizon Drops Sportsman Channel | TheBlaze.com:
"Famed rocker Ted Nugent unloaded on the concept of political correctness Thursday during a discussion tied to Verizon’s recent decision to drop the Sportsman Channel from its lineup.
Nugent, who hosts “Spirit of the Wild” on the Outdoors Channel, made the comments during an appearance on TheBlaze TV’s “Dana.”
Nugent, who hosts “Spirit of the Wild” on the Outdoors Channel, made the comments during an appearance on TheBlaze TV’s “Dana.”
Why we're talking about two horn-dogs, but not a coven of liars and thieves-----Lansing's assessor says Senate drastically overpaid for building owned by Republican donor
Lansing's assessor says Senate drastically overpaid for building owned by Republican donor - WXYZ.com:
"LANSING (WXYZ) - The Michigan Senate drastically overpaid for new office space purchased from a poltically-connected developer, according to Lansing's assessor of record.
William Fowler told Channel 7's Ross Jones that the $41 million purchase price isn't supported by the current real estate market in downtown Lansing.
"Based on everything you know, is this building anywhere near worth $41 million?" asked Channel 7's Ross Jones.
"Not in today’s market," Fowler said, calling the sales price "three times greater than anything that has sold downtown of comparable use."
Fowler says that his office currently has Capitol View assessed at about $12 million, a figure he says is closer to what it’s actually worth.
Were it to be built brand new today, his office estimates it would cost just under $22 million.
Fowler says his office won’t use Capitol View’s sale price as a benchmark for assessing other properties downtown.
The building has been dubbed the "Capitol View boondoggle" by Democratic lawmakers, and even though the project was pushed through by Republicans leadership, even many Republicans have a hard time defending the purchase.
"I don't think anybody's excited about it," said Rep. Al Pscholka (R-Stevensville). "I don't think anybody likes it."
But like it or not, barring some last-minute maneuver, Michigan taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for all of it: $41 million for the building, as much $10 million to fix it up and, when you add on 30-years of interest, a total cost of about $134 million.
It’s a much steeper price than just fixing-up the current senate offices, pegged at only $25 million.
But the top man in the Senate last year, Sen. Randy Richardville (R-Monroe), said that the previous building wasn’t secure enough.
Instead, he committed your tax dollars to a building owned by an influential republican donor Ron Boji.
His bid beat out three others..."
"LANSING (WXYZ) - The Michigan Senate drastically overpaid for new office space purchased from a poltically-connected developer, according to Lansing's assessor of record.
William Fowler told Channel 7's Ross Jones that the $41 million purchase price isn't supported by the current real estate market in downtown Lansing.
"Not in today’s market," Fowler said, calling the sales price "three times greater than anything that has sold downtown of comparable use."
Fowler says that his office currently has Capitol View assessed at about $12 million, a figure he says is closer to what it’s actually worth.
Were it to be built brand new today, his office estimates it would cost just under $22 million.
Fowler says his office won’t use Capitol View’s sale price as a benchmark for assessing other properties downtown.
The building has been dubbed the "Capitol View boondoggle" by Democratic lawmakers, and even though the project was pushed through by Republicans leadership, even many Republicans have a hard time defending the purchase.
But like it or not, barring some last-minute maneuver, Michigan taxpayers will be on the hook to pay for all of it: $41 million for the building, as much $10 million to fix it up and, when you add on 30-years of interest, a total cost of about $134 million.
It’s a much steeper price than just fixing-up the current senate offices, pegged at only $25 million.
But the top man in the Senate last year, Sen. Randy Richardville (R-Monroe), said that the previous building wasn’t secure enough.
Instead, he committed your tax dollars to a building owned by an influential republican donor Ron Boji.
His bid beat out three others..."
History for September 12
History for September 12 - On-This-Day.com
H.L. Mencken 1880, Maurice Chevalier 1888, Jesse Owens 1913
Ian Holm 1931, George Jones 1931, Linda Gray 1940 - Actress ("Dallas")
Maria Muldaur 1943 - Singer, Barry White 1944, Rachel Ward 1957 - Actress
1914 - The first battle of Marne ended when the allied forces stopped the German offensive in France.
1916 - Adelina and August Van Buren finished the first successful transcontinental motorcycle tour to be attempted by two women. They started in New York City on July 5, 1916.
1922 - The Episcopal Church removed the word "Obey" from the bride's section of wedding vows.
1938 - In a speech, Adolf Hitler demanded self-determination for the Sudeten Germans in Czechoslovakia.
1944 - U.S. Army troops entered Germany, near Trier, for the first time during World War II.
1953 - U.S. Senator John F. Kennedy married Jacqueline Lee Bouvier.
1954 - "Lassie" made its television debut on CBS. The last show aired on September 12, 1971.
1963 - The last episode of "Leave it to Beaver" was aired. The show had debuted on October 4, 1957.
1983 - Arnold Schwarzenegger became a U.S. citizen. He had emigrated from Austria 14 years earlier.
1992 - Dr. Mae Carol Jemison became the first African-American woman in space. She was the payload specialist aboard the space shuttle Endeavor. Also onboard were Mission Specialist N. Jan Davis and Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Mark C. Lee. They were the first married couple to fly together in space. And, Mamoru Mohri became the first Japanese person to fly into space.
Friday, September 11, 2015
‘I Cower to No One’: Marcus Luttrell’s Blunt Warning Should Send Chills Down the Spines of ‘Islamic Extremists’ | Video | TheBlaze.com
‘I Cower to No One’: Marcus Luttrell’s Blunt Warning Should Send Chills Down the Spines of ‘Islamic Extremists’ | Video | TheBlaze.com:
"Retired Navy SEAL Marcus Luttrell delivers a seriously blunt warning to “Islamic extremists” in a new TV spot for the National Rifle Association.
“I know you’re watching, so pay attention. You hate my freedom, my religion and my country…Don’t ever confuse me for my politicians or my media. I am an American, free born and free bred…"
“I know you’re watching, so pay attention. You hate my freedom, my religion and my country…Don’t ever confuse me for my politicians or my media. I am an American, free born and free bred…"
View from 9/11/2001---InstaPundit.Com : Archives
InstaPundit.Com : Archives:
Posted 9/11/2001 01:53:52 PM by Glenn Reynolds
TOM CLANCY WAS RIGHT: (Reposted from earlier today) And we're living one of his scenarios right now. Not much is known for sure, but it's obvious that the United States is the target of a major terrorist assault. There's a lot of bloviation on the cable news channels, most of which will turn out to be wrong or misleading later. Here, for your consideration, are a few points to be taken from past experience:
The Fog of War: Nobody knows much right now. Many things that we think we know are likely to be wrong.

Overreaction is the Terrorist's Friend: Even in major cases like this, the terrorist's real weapon is fear and hysteria. Overreacting will play into their hands.
It's Not Just Terrorists Who Take Advantage: Someone will propose new "Antiterrorism" legislation. It will be full of things off of bureaucrats' wish lists. They will be things that wouldn't have prevented these attacks even if they had been in place yesterday. Many of them will be civil-liberties disasters. Some of them will actually promote the kind of ill-feeling that breeds terrorism. That's what happened in 1996. Let's not let it happen again.
Only One Antiterrorism Method Works: That's punishing those behind it. The actual terrorists are hard to reach. But terrorism of this scale is always backed by governments. If they're punished severely -- and that means severely, not a bombed aspirin-factory but something that puts those behind it in the crosshairs -- this kind of thing won't happen again. That was the lesson of the Libyan bombing.
"Increased Security" Won't Work. When you try to defend everything, you defend nothing. Airport security is a joke because it's spread so thin that it can't possibly stop people who are really serious. You can't prevent terrorism by defensive measures; at most you can stop a few amateurs who can barely function. Note that the increased measures after TWA 800 (which wasn't terrorism anyway, we're told) didn't prevent what appear to be coordinated hijackings. (Archie Bunker's plan, in which each passenger is issued a gun on embarking, would have worked better). Deterrence works here, just as everywhere else. But you have to be serious about it.
For now, the terrorists have won. They've shut down the U.S. government, more or less. They've shut down air travel. They're all over TV. But whether they really win depends on how we deal with this; hysterically, or like angry -- but measured -- adults.
Posted 9/11/2001 02:06:02 PM by Glenn Reynolds
THERE'S A FIRST HAND ACCOUNT from the World Trade Center in Slate.Posted 9/11/2001 01:53:52 PM by Glenn Reynolds
TOM CLANCY WAS RIGHT: (Reposted from earlier today) And we're living one of his scenarios right now. Not much is known for sure, but it's obvious that the United States is the target of a major terrorist assault. There's a lot of bloviation on the cable news channels, most of which will turn out to be wrong or misleading later. Here, for your consideration, are a few points to be taken from past experience:
The Fog of War: Nobody knows much right now. Many things that we think we know are likely to be wrong.
Overreaction is the Terrorist's Friend: Even in major cases like this, the terrorist's real weapon is fear and hysteria. Overreacting will play into their hands.
It's Not Just Terrorists Who Take Advantage: Someone will propose new "Antiterrorism" legislation. It will be full of things off of bureaucrats' wish lists. They will be things that wouldn't have prevented these attacks even if they had been in place yesterday. Many of them will be civil-liberties disasters. Some of them will actually promote the kind of ill-feeling that breeds terrorism. That's what happened in 1996. Let's not let it happen again.
Only One Antiterrorism Method Works: That's punishing those behind it. The actual terrorists are hard to reach. But terrorism of this scale is always backed by governments. If they're punished severely -- and that means severely, not a bombed aspirin-factory but something that puts those behind it in the crosshairs -- this kind of thing won't happen again. That was the lesson of the Libyan bombing.
"Increased Security" Won't Work. When you try to defend everything, you defend nothing. Airport security is a joke because it's spread so thin that it can't possibly stop people who are really serious. You can't prevent terrorism by defensive measures; at most you can stop a few amateurs who can barely function. Note that the increased measures after TWA 800 (which wasn't terrorism anyway, we're told) didn't prevent what appear to be coordinated hijackings. (Archie Bunker's plan, in which each passenger is issued a gun on embarking, would have worked better). Deterrence works here, just as everywhere else. But you have to be serious about it.
For now, the terrorists have won. They've shut down the U.S. government, more or less. They've shut down air travel. They're all over TV. But whether they really win depends on how we deal with this; hysterically, or like angry -- but measured -- adults.
KKK-KlintonKultureKorruption----- O'KEEFE STRIKES AGAIN: Undercover Video Purports to Show Hillary Campaign Violating Election Law
O'KEEFE STRIKES AGAIN: Undercover Video Purports to Show Hillary Campaign Violating Election Law - Breitbart:
An undercover video published Thursday by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas purports to show Nevada-based Hillary Clinton campaign staffers and volunteers ignoring andknowingly violating Nevada’s voter registration laws. Moreover, the video appears to showthat this conduct is being condoned and encouraged by a local attorney who works for theClinton campaign.
An undercover video published Thursday by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas purports to show Nevada-based Hillary Clinton campaign staffers and volunteers ignoring andknowingly violating Nevada’s voter registration laws. Moreover, the video appears to showthat this conduct is being condoned and encouraged by a local attorney who works for theClinton campaign.
According to the video, it is a felony in the state of Nevada for anyone involved in the voter registration process to “solicit a vote for or against a particular question or candidate; speak to a voter on the subject of marking his or her ballot for or against a particular question or candidate.”
The video appears to show that numerous Hillary Clinton campaign staffers are well aware of the law. Nevertheless, the video shows them laughing at the law and repeatedly bragging about violating it by promoting Hillary Clinton verbally and with campaign literature as they attempt to register potential voters.
The Project Veritas video further appears to show that the Clinton campaign staff solicits voter registration in close proximity to state offices, which may also violate Nevada law
According to the video, when the attorney in question, identified as Christina Gupana, was told about this alleged lawbreaking, she advised the staffers to, “Do whatever you can. Whatever you can get away with, just do it, until you get kicked out like totally.”
More than one staffer says that the campaign’s motto towards these laws is “Ask for forgiveness, not for permission.”
Watch: Gowdy Does What He Does Best, Drops The HAMMER On Planned Parenthood
Watch: Gowdy Does What He Does Best, Drops The HAMMER On Planned Parenthood:
"On Wednesday, the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing on continued federal funding for Planned Parenthood over its baby organ harvesting service as seen in a series of videos put out by the Center For Medical Progress. After several Democrats mistreated the abortion survivors who testified, Representative Trey Gowdy (R, SC) did what he does best by verbally destroying liberals and their anti-intellectual arguments.
Rep. Gowdy, who has said he’ll work to defund the abortion mill operator, had a series of questions that totally undermined the arguments in favor of abortion."
Rep. Gowdy, who has said he’ll work to defund the abortion mill operator, had a series of questions that totally undermined the arguments in favor of abortion."
Good one! Read it and fear for the children. Your children!----Fourteen Years On
Fourteen Years On :: SteynOnline:
On Thursday I made my weekly appearance on The Hugh Hewitt Show.
We'll save some of the other subjects we discussed for a little later, but toward the end of our conversation (which you can find here, somewhat unreliably transcribed), Hugh asked me about today's anniversary:
HUGH HEWITT: Now speaking of blown sky high – "9/11" tomorrow. I asked Jeb Bush about this in the first hour. A
nd the question was, fourteen years later, the first seven years of that were run by your brother and then the second seven years were run by President Obama.
Are we safer today than we were on 9/12, 2001.
What do you Mark Steyn – Jeb Bush's answer is posted over at HughHewitt.com.
MARK STEYN: I think the problem is that we defined what we were up against in the fall of 2001, 2002 too narrowly - and I think you can see that actually at the time of the first anniversary in 2002. We are in an ideological struggle...
And we've seen that that ideology is very seductive to people who hold the passports of Western nations.
We are a hole, we are a vacuum - and something fills the vacuum, which is what we see in Europe and to a lesser extent over here.
And you can't fight this war even with the most brilliant military in the world because it's as I said in America Alone all those years ago - it's not my line, it's from Basil Liddell Hart, the great military strategist – it's not about blowing up their tanks and it's not about shooting their planes out of the sky – and nobody can beat Western militaries for doing that - but if you don't understand that you're up against this ideology and you don't target that ideology, then you can never win.
And that's why I find this anniversary about as dispiriting as any of the fourteen since that Tuesday morning all those years ago.
I don't know why I said that this ideological faintheartedness was evident even at the time of the first anniversary in 2002.
So, after the show, I turned to The Face of the Tiger, my account of the first year of the new war. Back then 9/11 was "the day everything changed".
With hindsight, very little changed, with the exception of Muslim immigration, which accelerated.
So, as I said to Hugh, I find these anniversaries more dispiriting with each passing year.
Here's what I had to say on September 11th 2002, all of which applies to 2015, only more so:
...I believe western culture – rule of law, universal suffrage, etc – is preferable to Arab culture: that's why there are millions of Muslims in Scandinavia, and four Scandinavians in Syria.
Follow the traffic.
I support immigration, but with assimilation.
Without it, like a Hindu widow, the west is slowly climbing on the funeral pyre of its lost empires. You see it in European foreign policy already: they're scared of their mysterious, swelling, unstoppable Muslim populations...
The Islamists are militarily weak but ideologically secure.
A year on, the west is just the opposite.
There's more than one way to lose a war.
On Thursday I made my weekly appearance on The Hugh Hewitt Show.
We'll save some of the other subjects we discussed for a little later, but toward the end of our conversation (which you can find here, somewhat unreliably transcribed), Hugh asked me about today's anniversary:
HUGH HEWITT: Now speaking of blown sky high – "9/11" tomorrow. I asked Jeb Bush about this in the first hour. A
nd the question was, fourteen years later, the first seven years of that were run by your brother and then the second seven years were run by President Obama.
Are we safer today than we were on 9/12, 2001.
What do you Mark Steyn – Jeb Bush's answer is posted over at HughHewitt.com.
MARK STEYN: I think the problem is that we defined what we were up against in the fall of 2001, 2002 too narrowly - and I think you can see that actually at the time of the first anniversary in 2002. We are in an ideological struggle...
And we've seen that that ideology is very seductive to people who hold the passports of Western nations.
We are a hole, we are a vacuum - and something fills the vacuum, which is what we see in Europe and to a lesser extent over here.
And you can't fight this war even with the most brilliant military in the world because it's as I said in America Alone all those years ago - it's not my line, it's from Basil Liddell Hart, the great military strategist – it's not about blowing up their tanks and it's not about shooting their planes out of the sky – and nobody can beat Western militaries for doing that - but if you don't understand that you're up against this ideology and you don't target that ideology, then you can never win.
And that's why I find this anniversary about as dispiriting as any of the fourteen since that Tuesday morning all those years ago.
So, after the show, I turned to The Face of the Tiger, my account of the first year of the new war. Back then 9/11 was "the day everything changed".
With hindsight, very little changed, with the exception of Muslim immigration, which accelerated.
So, as I said to Hugh, I find these anniversaries more dispiriting with each passing year.
Here's what I had to say on September 11th 2002, all of which applies to 2015, only more so:
...I believe western culture – rule of law, universal suffrage, etc – is preferable to Arab culture: that's why there are millions of Muslims in Scandinavia, and four Scandinavians in Syria.
Follow the traffic.
I support immigration, but with assimilation.
Without it, like a Hindu widow, the west is slowly climbing on the funeral pyre of its lost empires. You see it in European foreign policy already: they're scared of their mysterious, swelling, unstoppable Muslim populations...
The Islamists are militarily weak but ideologically secure.
A year on, the west is just the opposite.
There's more than one way to lose a war.
Confirming that the vast majority of Syrians arriving in Europe are Muslims, Saudi Arabia offers to build 200 mosques in Germany
Confirming that the vast majority of Syrians arriving in Europe are Muslims, Saudi Arabia offers to build 200 mosques in Germany « Refugee Resettlement Watch:
"Aren’t they generous, let’s give the Saudis a round of applause!
They don’t want to mess up their own country (or risk terrorism) by taking in their coreligionists as refugees, but are happy to help colonize Germany and build mosques.
Germany doesn’t have enough already?
Mosques, as many readers here know, serve to stake-out (to mark) Islam’s territory as the caliphate expands.
It is also the center of training for the advancement of the Islamic supremacist doctrine of shariah.
I predict that western historians will look back on this time and write whole books on what exactly motivated German Chancellor Angela Merkel to invite the invaders into Germany.
(If there are western historians that is!)"
They don’t want to mess up their own country (or risk terrorism) by taking in their coreligionists as refugees, but are happy to help colonize Germany and build mosques.
Germany doesn’t have enough already?
Mosques, as many readers here know, serve to stake-out (to mark) Islam’s territory as the caliphate expands.
It is also the center of training for the advancement of the Islamic supremacist doctrine of shariah.
I predict that western historians will look back on this time and write whole books on what exactly motivated German Chancellor Angela Merkel to invite the invaders into Germany.
(If there are western historians that is!)"
Islamic State Puts Two Hostages Up ‘For Sale’: ‘Limited-Time Offer’ | TheBlaze.com
Islamic State Puts Two Hostages Up ‘For Sale’: ‘Limited-Time Offer’ | TheBlaze.com:
"The Islamic State group put out “for sale” ads for two foreign hostages in its English-language propaganda magazine, calling it a “limited-time offer.”
The magazine Dabiq advertised the sale of a “Norwegian prisoner” and a “Chinese prisoner,” including mug shot-like photos of the men in yellow jumpsuits taken from various angles."

This is sick and heart-wrenching.
Meanwhile, our leaders continue to betray the American people.
Where do you stand?
"The Islamic State group put out “for sale” ads for two foreign hostages in its English-language propaganda magazine, calling it a “limited-time offer.”
The magazine Dabiq advertised the sale of a “Norwegian prisoner” and a “Chinese prisoner,” including mug shot-like photos of the men in yellow jumpsuits taken from various angles."
This is sick and heart-wrenching.
Meanwhile, our leaders continue to betray the American people.
Where do you stand?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)