27 Problems With Media's Latest Failed Attack On AG William Barr
- Every paragraph in the nearly 10,000-word New Yorker article has significant problems.
- Taken together, it is just one long string of innuendos insinuating that William Barr is evil.
"Some days it seems as if Attorney General William Barr is one of very few adults in Washington, D.C.
...Partisan media vehemently oppose Barr...mostly for admitting and expressing concern about the Department of Justice’s role in the Russia collusion hoax that undermined the Trump administration.
Nearly the entire
political media establishment worked with anonymous sources inside the government and Democratic offices to spread the false conspiracy theory that Trump was a traitor who had colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton.
...As the media did with Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), who accurately raised the alarm about Russia collusion story, they have put out a
series of attacks and hit pieces on Barr and John Durham, the federal prosecutor Barr appointed to investigate the FBI’s spying on the Trump campaign.
The playbook is for the media and Democrats to discredit whomever they decide is a threat.
...One Washington Post headline: “John Durham has a stellar reputation for investigating corruption. Some fear his work for Barr could tarnish it.”
As in, if Durham’s investigation doesn’t match the false narrative set by the Post and other media outlets, they’ll rewrite the story about his reputation.
Nice reputation you have, Durham.
Shame if something happened to it..."
MUST READ ALL!!
