"..."We have never even sought to suppress or end a pandemic through running alongside creating a novel vaccine and then intervening with it,” said Yeadon.
- “Why? Because—this is really important—the elapsed time taken to get an adequate amount of safety data is always longer than the feasible length of any pandemic in history.”
- “And if you take less time, it means you do not have an appropriate amount of safety data.”
...Yeadon said that government shouldn’t coerce people to receive the vaccines with only 2-month-long institutional safety data.
“What’s the safety profile six months after you’ve taken it? No one can tell you.”
“I’ve been in drug discovery, drug development for 34 years now.
“I’ve been in drug discovery, drug development for 34 years now.
Safety is the most important thing, even more important than effectiveness.
Why? Because you’re going to give it to lots of people. So if you’re not really, really sure about the safety, you can easily hurt more people than you could possibly save. That would be doubly so when using a new type of technology,” said Yeadon.
...“They said, ‘No. We didn’t cut any corners. We did things in parallel,'” said Yeadon.
...“They said, ‘No. We didn’t cut any corners. We did things in parallel,'” said Yeadon.
“No, they didn’t do lots of studies, and they’re missing from the regulatory submission.
What that means, I’m afraid, is that the regulators are guilty of fraud.”...
No comments:
Post a Comment