Demand an End to Liberal Privilege | PJ Media
"...The
left refers to people of “privileged background” for instance, when what they really mean is “rich” or, these days, “middle class and with parents who insisted on education.”
I suppose this makes some sense in the context of a leftist world view, but it makes no sense in reality.
...For instance, take the Kavanaugh hearings when all the liberals were assuring us that
we didn’t need to presume innocence until guilt was proven.
Did you notice that not only didn’t any of them revise their opinion of the sexual scandals of Bill Clinton – against whom guilt was overwhelmingly proven – but they were also adamant that the same principles they were trying to apply to Kavanaugh didn’t apply to Keith Ellison?
This makes absolutely no sense.
If you “believe all women” (and btw, that too is privilege. Where is the “believe all men?”) why not believe Ellison’s battered girlfriend, who has the hospital visit to prove it, or Juanita Broderick before you believe Christine Ford?
...You see, they know the principle but can’t say it aloud – some of them not even to themselves – because that would
cause them to admit that they are chock-full of privilege, which their theories force them to view as a sin.
In fact, all their claims of other people’s privilege are to excuse their own establishment of a private law for themselves.
For instance, how many discussions have you seen in which s
ome white man is told to stop talking because he’s full of “white privilege” and should “educate himself.”...
Read on.
Woman dies of flesh-eating bacteria after spider bite
