A
This is as it should be. It is right and just that the courts, in the name of justice, should strike down racial preferences, a pernicious, do-gooding racism sweeping schools, corporations, and the media. It treats all American experience through the lens of race. It would be even worse if the racialism embedded in so-called "critical race theory" were backed by government force.
"Imagine, if you will, a doctor. This doctor, a psychiatrist, is not a fan of black people. In fact, while giving a talk at the Yale School of Medicine’s Child Study Center, the professor said some unsavory things.
“I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any black person that got in my way, burying their body, and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step. Like I did the world a fucking favor.”
“Black people are out of their minds and they have been for a long time.”
“Ever since I was a little kid, since I’ve interacted with people who are black, and especially black women, I would notice that things were really off.”
...this is some overt racism. The only people who would tolerate this kind of thing are people who are racists themselves and aren’t afraid to show it. We all know that.
Now, what if I told you that wasn’t precisely what the psychiatrist said?
Oh, did I mention I didn’t write any of those quotes? I took an actual person’s words, I just changed one thing.
I substituted the word “black” for “white.”
That’s right, this is a psychiatrist who openly discussed her fantasies of shooting a white person simply for getting in her way.
And, most importantly, she felt perfectly safe espousing such beliefs. What’s more, it doesn’t look like she faced much in the way of pushback until after Yale released the talk.
Let that sink in a bit. She expresses her fantasies to murder innocent people because of the color of their skin, and that kick in for a bit. Now, look at her justification for it...Read all.
...the Lafayette Park clearing that took place last year on June 1st, the day after the historic St. John’s Church in Washington, D.C. was set on fire by Antifa/BLM-led rioters.
For those who missed it, the report released by the IG directly contradicted the volumes of media reports that claimed President Trump and Attorney General Bill Barr had the park forcibly cleared and demonstrators “tear-gassed” so Trump could stage a “photo op” walk from the White House, where he had just given a speech denouncing rioting, to St. John’s Church.
From the summary...(click)
...it’s important we take a look back to see just how deeply invested those outlets were in keeping their false narratives alive about what happened.
CNN, of course, led the way – with Jim Acosta featuring prominently in many of their stories on the incident, but there were many others, including the WaPo, New York Times, NPR, and Vox: (Read all!!)
InfoWars reported last week that China is paying US companies to push their Chicom propaganda through the China Daily.
...We’ve observed over the past few years how American media has pushed Chicom propaganda.China Daily, a Chinese state-run media outlet, is currently paying multiple U.S. news agencies millions of dollars to publish Chicom propaganda.
According to Justice Department documents, Time magazine, the Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, and Foreign Policy magazine are all currently receiving money from the Chinese outlet.
For example, as part of a $700,000 advertising campaign paid for by China Daily, Time published 75 online articles from the outletin the past year...Read all.
